In my career as a web development I’ve seen a lot of brilliant and competent people, as well as a lot of utter incompetents, on all levels of the corporate ladder and working at all levels of productivity. Basically, if I were to make a competence scale, it would look something like this:
– <–10-9-8-7-6-4-5-4-3-2-1-0-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9-10–> +
Let’s say user data release by AOL would rate at negative 7; setting out to rewrite Netscape from scratch at negative 9; changing all the links of an established website in the name of SEO at negative 5; writing tons of spaghetti code that nevertheless functions and serves users at positive 1; coming up with PageRank algorithm and implementing it — at positive 10. There are also those who come into the office and do nothing at all – that’s 0. Ase we all seem to notice and remember negative things better than positive, sometimes corporate life seems like one big orgy of incompetence and bad ideas.
I’ve long had a theory, why even with so many negative contributions, American companies mostly prosper and thrive, despite incompetency. To explain it, I usually use an ant metaphor. See, when ants are carrying a bug or a caterpillar back to the nest, they almost always succeed. But the thing is, they do not cooperate very well. They all have different ideas about which way to pull, and some, instead of helping, actually climb on the cargo or collide with other ants. Others just watch from the sidelines and generally mill about. But even though ants pull in different directions, the resulting force vector generally leads to the nest, and the caterpillar gets there eventually.
Recently, an article about a designer Paul Frank caught my attention. He is fighting his former business partners who jettisoned him from the company bearing his name. He came up with the design ideas that made the company what it is, as well as lent it his name. The business partners accused him of not contributing to the daily business grind, bought out his shares and either fired him or drove him to resigning (depends on whose story you listen to). It’s getting nasty:
” “Those guys are saying Paul Frank is not a person,” says the designer, whose given name is Paul Frank Sunich. “I hear they’re all wearing T-shirts that say ‘We Are Paul Frank.’ Well, you’re Paul Frank Industries. You’re not Paul Frank.”
I’ve seen the monkey design that Paul Frank is so famous for, but did not know that it was a multimillion dollar business. Apparently it’s very popular – and I definitely do believe that both the business partners that made this quirky brand into such a powerhouse and the guy who conceived it made positive contributions.
What I have the issue with is the person who’s running their web department. It’s not even the unusable obnoxious flash-ridden websites that don’t work in Firefox. It’s the fact that this person apparently never did something very basic – typed in “Paul Frank” into Google. Because when you do, you get this as a first result:
I don’t have a problem with the programmer who used a stock client detection script from somewhere. We all do that. But putting “Client Detection Script” as the title of the first page of your site is rather idiotic. And nobody at the company even searched for “Paul Frank” in Google, even if to see what other Paul Franks there are out there!
Getting back to my ant theory, squabbles, badly designed websites and all those people who prolifically do bad things are balanced out by things done right. The website may suck, but the brand is so good that people will put up with it. Individual ants might be doing stupid and counterproductive things, but it all gets balanced out. The caterpillar gets dragged into the nest, whether it wants it or not.
Pingback: fight club brad pitt flashes
Pingback: mission fitness
Pingback: Dallas Boudoir Photographer
Pingback: downtown dentist toronto
Pingback: pre workout supplements
Pingback: Cheap Cruises
Pingback: mobile coupons target
Pingback: best shampoo for oily hair
Pingback: Ingersoll Rand Air Compressor
Pingback: Coping with Stress
Pingback: Phil Cannella
Pingback: how to get rid of acne
Pingback: Jake Reeds
Pingback: Facebook Cover Design
Pingback: geocaching gps
Pingback: Marketing
Pingback: Chicago immigration attorney
Pingback: bingo game cards
Pingback: San Francisco SEO Company
Pingback: spamfilter
Pingback: noclegi zakopane
Pingback: linkbuilding
Pingback: Pacquiao vs Mayweather
Pingback: what is serotonin
Pingback: work at home
Pingback: hugeyields
Pingback: make money daily
Pingback: blonde model
Pingback: motivation for weight loss
Pingback: essays
Pingback: vw campervan
Pingback: Wholesale Clothing
Pingback: how to be a respiratory therapist
Pingback: backlinks
Pingback: Blog sex
Pingback: Bodybuilding supplements
Pingback: Scott Tucker Racing
Pingback: Scott Tucker CBS
Pingback: Okna Gniezno
Pingback: Scott Tucker CBS
Pingback: Scott Tucker Leawood
Pingback: join huge yield
Pingback: SEO Link Monster
Pingback: Dynavin Navigation Multimedia
Pingback: Watch TV Online Live
Pingback: tree surgeons Cardiff
Pingback: Scott Tucker Payday Loans
Pingback: Scott Tucker Racing
Pingback: insurance industry rss feeds
Pingback: music video production nyc
Pingback: Scott Tucker Racing
Pingback: Scott Tucker CBS
Pingback: Appraisal Management Companies
Pingback: bpo agent
Pingback: lipo 6 hers reviews
Pingback: electric cigarette
Pingback: steven cymbrowitz
Pingback: hair removal
Pingback: boot camp training
Pingback: ecommerce seo
Pingback: natural remedies for cold sores
Pingback: hemi
Pingback: football speed
Pingback: Euro
Pingback: Deposit account
Pingback: Pokrycia Dachowe
Pingback: Hundefutter test
Pingback: Natural Gout Treatment
Pingback: tarot gratis
Pingback: maryland short sale attorney
Pingback: Legal Smoking Herbs
Pingback: genital warts treatment
Pingback: Mass Income Multiplier
Pingback: sugar daddy
Pingback: free cam porn
Pingback: resume
Pingback: activity centre
Pingback: escorts melbourne
Pingback: psd to html
Pingback: buy website traffic
Pingback: Scott Tucker CBS
Pingback: Scott Tucker CBS
Pingback: Kinky Curly curling custard
for a couple days our index page did have a client detection script on it with that title. Unfortunately that title got listed by google at that time. We noticed it right away and changed it. I was not very happen that this mistake made it on the live site. I am sure many designers have made the simple mistake of missing a title. I am sorry that you feel the need to say that our website sucks.
- counterproductive ant at pf
-1 for not using web standards and needing a client detection script in the first place.
Standards-shmandards. I really don’t care if something is standards-compliant or not as long as it works :)