Photoshop Disasters

Seetharaman Narayanan did more to alter reality than 99.99999999 percent of people in this world. It’s ridiculous how much the look of everything changed after Photoshop. All the ads, illustrations, all the graphics in the world look different than they did in the 70s and 80s.

If you wish, Adobe website will give you a number of useful lessons on how to use Adobe trademarks, such as:

“CORRECT: The image was enhanced using Adobe® Photoshop® software.
INCORRECT: The image was photoshopped.”

and

“CORRECT: The image was enhanced with Adobe® Photoshop® Elements software.
INCORRECT: The image was photoshopped.
INCORRECT: The image was Photoshopped.
INCORRECT: The image was Adobe® Photoshopped. ”

Meanwhile everything I see around me in printed form has been photoshopped to death. These days when a professional digital camera is cheaper than a copy of Adobe® Photoshop® software and the streets of major cities are full of starving young models, the photoshopers out there would rather spend hours doing unnatural things with expensive stock photos.

I could understand this if the companies who would be doing this were short on money. But you know, when the same crappy stock photo is used in an ad for Vagisil and an O’Reilly book cover? That’s ridiculous.

There’s this blog that I’ve been reading lately called “Office Snapshots”. Recently they showed pictures of the offices of Vertrue. The seem to have spent more on a single chair than on the design of their “about us” page. Take a look: the title of the graphic boldly states “WHO WE ARE”. Judging by the graphic the answer is: “We are some smiling office drones from a crummy stock photo.”

Another fun blog that I’ve been reading is Photoshop Disasters. They mock crummy designers. After reading it I started paying a bit more attention to the small details of various ads. It’s crazy how many disturbing details there are. For instance, just now, I picked up a copy of some magazine that my wife was reading. Literally the first ad that I saw had a 6-fingered model:

Alteration of reality in photographs is not a new phenomenon, of course. There’s a great book called “The Commissar Vanishes” about the way photographs were altered in the Soviet times, especially to disappear repressed individuals. Besides sequences of photos of Stalin together with “disappearing” commissars, there’s a portrait of Stalin done by a pretty incompetent painter. Stalin, upon seeing the picture, crossed out the ear and wrote the following:

“This ear says that the artist is not well schooled in anatomy. J.Stalin.”

“The ear screams and shouts against anatomy. J.S.”

I don’t have a scan of that page, but believe you me, that ear was almost as disturbing much of the photoshopped models in today’s ads.

54 thoughts on “Photoshop Disasters

  1. Pingback: mission fitness

  2. Pingback: Dallas Boudoir Photographer

  3. Pingback: pre workout supplements

  4. Pingback: best supplement for muscle gain

  5. Pingback: Grassy Knoll

  6. Pingback: webcam chat

  7. Pingback: simran possessed

  8. Pingback: Printable Hometown Buffet Coupons

  9. Pingback: LED Lights

  10. Pingback: Ross Pine

  11. Pingback: Dentist

  12. Pingback: cleaning business

  13. Pingback: read us

  14. Pingback: buy Twitter followers for cheap

  15. Pingback: Roswell Garage Door Repair

  16. Pingback: Supplements

  17. Pingback: MEDITATION AND KARMA

  18. Pingback: Jesse V.

  19. Pingback: Meet and Greet Parking Gatwick Airport

  20. Pingback: mixed martial arts

  21. Pingback: best way to scrunch hair

  22. Pingback: linkbuilding

  23. Pingback: Notarztkurs sylt

  24. Pingback: Scott Tucker Payday Loans

  25. Pingback: Scott Tucker Racing

  26. Pingback: what you think about that

  27. Pingback: BPO Companies

  28. Pingback: how do I blog

  29. Pingback: Scott Tucker Payday Loans

  30. Pingback: treating cold sores

  31. Pingback: football speed

  32. Pingback: http://www.athletesacceleration.com/sportsarticles.html

  33. Pingback: exhibition stands

  34. Pingback: Free Makeup Samples

  35. Pingback: hgh

  36. Pingback: backyard aquaponics

  37. Pingback: how to get a girlfriend

  38. Pingback: Free File Hosting

  39. Pingback: Hockey News

  40. Pingback: tarot gratis

  41. Pingback: Tacoma Web Design

  42. Pingback: Air Conditioning Maintenance

  43. Pingback: payday loans

  44. Pingback: Mass Income Multiplier

  45. Pingback: Julene Bethune

  46. Pingback: Pest Control Tampa

  47. Pingback: sugar daddie

  48. Pingback: recipes

  49. Pingback: Scott Tucker Racing

  50. Pingback: Scott Tucker CBS

  51. Pingback: Uncorded curtain poles

  52. It always shocks me when companies like Adobe object to the “verbing” of their trademarks– it seems like the highest possible compliment to me.

  53. They don’t want compliments. They want trademarks to stay trademarks and not become generic expressions. On the other hand wanting something does not make it so.

  54. My generation (I’m 67) used to say smugly that “photos don’t lie!” WOW – what a road of rubbish. Photos have been lying for a long time, and gullible people believe what they “see”. Just because words and pictures appear in print is unfortunately no guarantee of anything. Remember that, next time you read or see something. Now if I hear or see criticism of a person or group, I suspect that they/it must be good. Likewise with compromising photos!