<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dead Programmer&#039;s Cafe &#187; Metablogging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.deadprogrammer.com/category/metablogging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.deadprogrammer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 21:26:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Varnished WordPress</title>
		<link>http://www.deadprogrammer.com/varnished-wordpress/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=varnished-wordpress</link>
		<comments>http://www.deadprogrammer.com/varnished-wordpress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 15:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>deadprogrammer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Metablogging]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.deadprogrammer.com/?p=2587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As this blog comes closer to the 10th year anniversary, my blogging software choices continue to change. So far the path has been: Livejournal -&#62; Movable Type -&#62; WordPress -&#62; Drupal 5 -&#62; Pressflow Drupal 6. Since I had some &#8230; <a href="http://www.deadprogrammer.com/varnished-wordpress/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As this blog comes closer to the 10th year anniversary, my blogging software choices continue to change. So far the path has been: Livejournal -&gt; Movable Type -&gt; WordPress -&gt; Drupal 5 -&gt; Pressflow Drupal 6. Since I had some time on my hands lately, as an exercise, I decided to upgrade to Drupal 7, but after a few hours gave up in complete disgust. Drupal community is very proud for keeping its technical debt very low, but they rarely talk about who pays it.</p>
<p>It turned out to be quicker to export everything to the latest version of WordPress. I still like Drupal, but latest WordPress has some really nice features. I also took the time to install Varnish and trick out my sites with reasonably advanced caching via Memcached and APC. I also switched to Percona MySQL just for kicks.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.deadprogrammer.com/photos/Webmaster_Tools_-_Crawl_stats-20111216-105538.jpg?9d7bd4" alt="Webmaster Tools Crawl stats" /></p>
<p>I&#8217;m still working on theming the blog, and tweaking, so things will break from time to time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.deadprogrammer.com/varnished-wordpress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>76</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hiatus</title>
		<link>http://www.deadprogrammer.com/hiatus/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=hiatus</link>
		<comments>http://www.deadprogrammer.com/hiatus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>deadprogrammer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Metablogging]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Deadprogrammer.com is going on hiatus. I want to concentrate on a couple of projects that I'm about to launch. <a href="http://www.deadprogrammer.com/hiatus/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deadprogrammer.com is going on hiatus. I want to concentrate on a couple of projects that I&#8217;m about to launch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.deadprogrammer.com/hiatus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>116</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Semantic Web</title>
		<link>http://www.deadprogrammer.com/semantic-web/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=semantic-web</link>
		<comments>http://www.deadprogrammer.com/semantic-web/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>deadprogrammer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Metablogging]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Deadprogrammer.com is one step closer to the brave new world of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semantic_Web">semantic web</a>. Over the weekend I implemented <a href="http://www.opencalais.com/">Open Calais</a>, an auto-tagging service from Reuters. 

Being lazy, I haven't tagged my content very well, and now, faced with with over a thousand posts, hand-tagging them is not something that I have the time for.  I thought about creating a tagging interface and asking my readers to contribute to a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Folksonomy">folksonomy</a>, but it would probably result in two valid tags and a million "viaggggrrarr" and "vikkoddinn" ones - spammers try to enter a lot of tags for some reason.

Calais is a neat web service. In a nutshell, you pass it the text of your posts and it returns an xml document containing tags in various categories. The set of categories is huge: RadioStation, MedicalTreatment, Movie, City, Person are just some of them. Unfortunately I did not set everything up correctly, and some of the more interesting categories did not get populated as I was indexing the old posts.

Meanwhile, my posts are a bit better tagged now, and you can take a look at a tag <a href="http://www.deadprogrammer.com/tagadelic/chunk/18">cloud of people</a> and <a href="http://www.deadprogrammer.com/tagadelic/chunk/4">cities</a> mentioned in my blog. <a href="http://www.deadprogrammer.com/semantic-web/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deadprogrammer.com is one step closer to the brave new world of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semantic_Web">semantic web</a>. Over the weekend I implemented <a href="http://www.opencalais.com/">Open Calais</a>, an auto-tagging service from Reuters. </p>
<p>Being lazy, I haven&#8217;t tagged my content very well, and now, faced with with over a thousand posts, hand-tagging them is not something that I have the time for.  I thought about creating a tagging interface and asking my readers to contribute to a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Folksonomy">folksonomy</a>, but it would probably result in two valid tags and a million &#8220;viaggggrrarr&#8221; and &#8220;vikkoddinn&#8221; ones &#8211; spammers try to enter a lot of tags for some reason.</p>
<p>Calais is a neat web service. In a nutshell, you pass it the text of your posts and it returns an xml document containing tags in various categories. The set of categories is huge: RadioStation, MedicalTreatment, Movie, City, Person are just some of them. Unfortunately I did not set everything up correctly, and some of the more interesting categories did not get populated as I was indexing the old posts.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, my posts are a bit better tagged now, and you can take a look at a tag <a href="http://www.deadprogrammer.com/tagadelic/chunk/18#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed">cloud of people</a> and <a href="http://www.deadprogrammer.com/tagadelic/chunk/4#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed">cities</a> mentioned in my blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.deadprogrammer.com/semantic-web/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>137</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amazon Ads in RSS Feeds</title>
		<link>http://www.deadprogrammer.com/amazon-ads-in-rss-feeds/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=amazon-ads-in-rss-feeds</link>
		<comments>http://www.deadprogrammer.com/amazon-ads-in-rss-feeds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>deadprogrammer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Metablogging]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A while back I've added an advertising module to my site that allows me to inject amazon item ads both into the site content and into the rss feeds.  I hand pick the items, which most of the time fall into one of the three categories: stuff that I would probably want myself, stuff that I already have, stuff that I mentioned in the post, and stuff that is just funny. Four categories.

This is not "punch the monkey", not the same one ad that some bloggers stuff into their rss feeds and keep there forever until you are sick of it. From time to time the amazon items are really funny.

On the other hand, at my level of readers, the princely 6% commission that I get on Amazon purchases that come through the site, it's not really a major financial incentive. The ads do cover my hosting expenses, but I do kinda feel guilty of thrusting the ads on my readers.  

So, tell me, what do you think about the ads? Should I just junk them?  I already replaced some of the ads on the site with links and ads for products that I simply like, without getting any payment, just as a way to say "thank you" to the people who make these products. I might do the same thing with the rest of the ads. <a href="http://www.deadprogrammer.com/amazon-ads-in-rss-feeds/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A while back I&#8217;ve added an advertising module to my site that allows me to inject amazon item ads both into the site content and into the rss feeds.  I hand pick the items, which most of the time fall into one of the three categories: stuff that I would probably want myself, stuff that I already have, stuff that I mentioned in the post, and stuff that is just funny. Four categories.</p>
<p>This is not &#8220;punch the monkey&#8221;, not the same one ad that some bloggers stuff into their rss feeds and keep there forever until you are sick of it. From time to time the amazon items are really funny.</p>
<p>On the other hand, at my level of readers, the princely 6% commission that I get on Amazon purchases that come through the site, it&#8217;s not really a major financial incentive. The ads do cover my hosting expenses, but I do kinda feel guilty of thrusting the ads on my readers.  </p>
<p>So, tell me, what do you think about the ads? Should I just junk them?  I already replaced some of the ads on the site with links and ads for products that I simply like, without getting any payment, just as a way to say &#8220;thank you&#8221; to the people who make these products. I might do the same thing with the rest of the ads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.deadprogrammer.com/amazon-ads-in-rss-feeds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>529</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>State of the blog 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.deadprogrammer.com/state-of-the-blog-2008/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=state-of-the-blog-2008</link>
		<comments>http://www.deadprogrammer.com/state-of-the-blog-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>deadprogrammer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Metablogging]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A while ago Merlin Mann gave <a href="http://www.43folders.com/2008/08/19/good-blogs">a pretty neat definition of what makes blogs good</a>:   

"  1. Good blogs have a voice. 
2. Good blogs reflect focused obsessions.
3. Good blogs are the product of "Attention times Interest"
4. Good blog posts are made of paragraphs.
5. Good "non-post" blogs have style and curation.
6. Good blogs are weird. 
7. Good blogs make you want to start your own blog. 
8. Good blogs try. 
9. Good blogs know when to break their own rules. "

My list would have been very similar, and I am pretty sure deadprogrammer.com is a good blog. God knows I try :)

<img src="http://www.deadprogrammer.com/photos/blog-stats-2008.png?9d7bd4">

On the other hand, I seem to have about the same thousand readers I had 4 years ago. I was kind of hoping that my writing and photography would work on their own, bringing me a steady stream of new readers. It does not seem to be working. Every time I try to put some extra effort into a post, my hopes of somebody linking to it, digging it, twittering about it, or even just leaving me a thoughtful comment are dashed. After a few years of this, it gets harder and harder for me to write. My posting frequency is not what it used to be.

Several hundred readers still subscribe to my blog from Livejournal. The majority of the rest resulted from a single <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2005/06/20/starbucks-mermaid-fr.html">Boing Boing post</a>. I don't really think it's the most interesting post I ever wrote, but to this day it brings in about 25% of my search engine traffic, and the majority of outside links. 

Back then I actively tried submitting my posts to <a href="http://www.deadprogrammer.com/the-black-hole">Boing Boing</a>. Boing Boing submission form can rival <a href="http://www.deadprogrammer.com/the-black-hole">magazine publisher's black hole</a>.  I finally practically begged <a hef="http://craphound.com/">Cory Doctorow</a> in a personal email to take a look at at the Starbucks post (which the submission form vaporized previously), and I did get that link. 

I tried to get <a href="http://kottke.org/">Jason Kottke</a> interested in my blog, especially since it seems to me that a lot of the stuff that I write about is very much up his alley, but after a chat or two I got tired of pitching. It just does not fell right for me to buttonhole busy A-list bloggers - hey, look, I wrote this, you might like it.

Anyhoo, what's the point of all this?  Apparently I suck at PR and self-promotion, and I would really like some help here from the audience.  Do you know somebody who'd enjoy reading Deadprogramemer.com? Please, tell them, especially if it's an A, B, C, D or E list blogger. Please? <a href="http://www.deadprogrammer.com/state-of-the-blog-2008/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A while ago Merlin Mann gave <a href="http://www.43folders.com/2008/08/19/good-blogs">a pretty neat definition of what makes blogs good</a>:   </p>
<p>&#8221;  1. Good blogs have a voice.<br />
2. Good blogs reflect focused obsessions.<br />
3. Good blogs are the product of &#8220;Attention times Interest&#8221;<br />
4. Good blog posts are made of paragraphs.<br />
5. Good &#8220;non-post&#8221; blogs have style and curation.<br />
6. Good blogs are weird.<br />
7. Good blogs make you want to start your own blog.<br />
8. Good blogs try.<br />
9. Good blogs know when to break their own rules. &#8221;</p>
<p>My list would have been very similar, and I am pretty sure deadprogrammer.com is a good blog. God knows I try :)</p>
<p><img src="http://www.deadprogrammer.com/photos/blog-stats-2008.png?9d7bd4"></p>
<p>On the other hand, I seem to have about the same thousand readers I had 4 years ago. I was kind of hoping that my writing and photography would work on their own, bringing me a steady stream of new readers. It does not seem to be working. Every time I try to put some extra effort into a post, my hopes of somebody linking to it, digging it, twittering about it, or even just leaving me a thoughtful comment are dashed. After a few years of this, it gets harder and harder for me to write. My posting frequency is not what it used to be.</p>
<p>Several hundred readers still subscribe to my blog from Livejournal. The majority of the rest resulted from a single <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2005/06/20/starbucks-mermaid-fr.html">Boing Boing post</a>. I don&#8217;t really think it&#8217;s the most interesting post I ever wrote, but to this day it brings in about 25% of my search engine traffic, and the majority of outside links. </p>
<p>Back then I actively tried submitting my posts to <a href="http://www.deadprogrammer.com/the-black-hole#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed">Boing Boing</a>. Boing Boing submission form can rival <a href="http://www.deadprogrammer.com/the-black-hole#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed">magazine publisher&#8217;s black hole</a>.  I finally practically begged <a hef="http://craphound.com/">Cory Doctorow</a> in a personal email to take a look at at the Starbucks post (which the submission form vaporized previously), and I did get that link. </p>
<p>I tried to get <a href="http://kottke.org/">Jason Kottke</a> interested in my blog, especially since it seems to me that a lot of the stuff that I write about is very much up his alley, but after a chat or two I got tired of pitching. It just does not fell right for me to buttonhole busy A-list bloggers &#8211; hey, look, I wrote this, you might like it.</p>
<p>Anyhoo, what&#8217;s the point of all this?  Apparently I suck at PR and self-promotion, and I would really like some help here from the audience.  Do you know somebody who&#8217;d enjoy reading Deadprogramemer.com? Please, tell them, especially if it&#8217;s an A, B, C, D or E list blogger. Please?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.deadprogrammer.com/state-of-the-blog-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook Page For Deadprogrammer.com</title>
		<link>http://www.deadprogrammer.com/facebook-page-for-deadprogrammercom/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=facebook-page-for-deadprogrammercom</link>
		<comments>http://www.deadprogrammer.com/facebook-page-for-deadprogrammercom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>deadprogrammer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Metablogging]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a desperate bid to shore up deadprogrammer.com readership I've created a Facebook page. Please go <a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Deadprogrammers-Cafe/20104797388?ref=mf">and become a "fan" of it on Facebook</a>. The idea is that once you become a fan, a message about that will appear in your friend's news feeds. They'll become curious and check out Deadprogrammer's Cafe. That will result in an ego boost for me and a few fresh posts (one about the nature of time, and a series about my trip to my hometown of Odessa). 

Facebook fan page is a neat and low effort passive-aggressive way of promotion. They take just a few minutes to create.  On the other hand, they look pretty lonely when you only have two fans yourself, and your mother. And my mom doesn't even have a Facebook account.

P.S. If you are <a href="http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=503582219">friending me on Facebook</a>, just mention that you are reading my blog or something. <a href="http://www.deadprogrammer.com/facebook-page-for-deadprogrammercom/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a desperate bid to shore up deadprogrammer.com readership I&#8217;ve created a Facebook page. Please go <a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Deadprogrammers-Cafe/20104797388?ref=mf">and become a &#8220;fan&#8221; of it on Facebook</a>. The idea is that once you become a fan, a message about that will appear in your friend&#8217;s news feeds. They&#8217;ll become curious and check out Deadprogrammer&#8217;s Cafe. That will result in an ego boost for me and a few fresh posts (one about the nature of time, and a series about my trip to my hometown of Odessa). </p>
<p>Facebook fan page is a neat and low effort passive-aggressive way of promotion. They take just a few minutes to create.  On the other hand, they look pretty lonely when you only have two fans yourself, and your mother. And my mom doesn&#8217;t even have a Facebook account.</p>
<p>P.S. If you are <a href="http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=503582219" class="broken_link">friending me on Facebook</a>, just mention that you are reading my blog or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.deadprogrammer.com/facebook-page-for-deadprogrammercom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>586</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter</title>
		<link>http://www.deadprogrammer.com/twitter/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=twitter</link>
		<comments>http://www.deadprogrammer.com/twitter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>deadprogrammer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Metablogging]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I now have a twitter account - for <a title="" href="http://twitter.com/deadprogrammer">my minuscule mind shards that I was too lazy to put into the blog</a>. Do you think I should aggregate those into daily posts on Deadprogramemr.com?</p><p>P.S. I said shards, not <a title="" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XUWqDnAQYSg">sharts</a>.<br /> </p> <a href="http://www.deadprogrammer.com/twitter/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I now have a twitter account &#8211; for <a title="" href="http://twitter.com/deadprogrammer">my minuscule mind shards that I was too lazy to put into the blog</a>. Do you think I should aggregate those into daily posts on Deadprogramemr.com?</p>
<p>P.S. I said shards, not <a title="" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XUWqDnAQYSg">sharts</a>. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.deadprogrammer.com/twitter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>89</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My Return to Blogging</title>
		<link>http://www.deadprogrammer.com/content/my-return-blogging/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=content%2Fmy-return-blogging</link>
		<comments>http://www.deadprogrammer.com/content/my-return-blogging/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>deadprogrammer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Metablogging]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I am finally free of lousy Dreamhost. I also switched from <a href="http://wordpress.org/">Wordpress</a> to <a href="http://drupal.org/">Drupal</a>.  There probably will be some glitches and missing urls,  and the design will stay in the current stock "Garland" theme, but I am back. 
</p><p>
I also apologize in advance for rss feed glitches that might happen - I am still tweaking the site.</p>  <a href="http://www.deadprogrammer.com/content/my-return-blogging/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am finally free of lousy Dreamhost. I also switched from <a href="http://wordpress.org/">WordPress</a> to <a href="http://drupal.org/">Drupal</a>.  There probably will be some glitches and missing urls,  and the design will stay in the current stock &#8220;Garland&#8221; theme, but I am back.
</p>
<p>
I also apologize in advance for rss feed glitches that might happen &#8211; I am still tweaking the site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.deadprogrammer.com/content/my-return-blogging/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oy, Again With The Moving&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.deadprogrammer.com/oy-again-with-the-moving/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=oy-again-with-the-moving</link>
		<comments>http://www.deadprogrammer.com/oy-again-with-the-moving/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>deadprogrammer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Metablogging]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Using Dreamhost is quickly turning into nightmare. It's a cheap, full featured and generous web host, except only good for websites that do not matter (and I think that mine do).  There is no upgrade path to a virtual private server (which is one step below a dedicated machine both in price and performance), their overall uptime is not something I'd trust, and their blog is just driving me nuts.  At the suggestion of a friend I'm moving over to <a href="http://www.webintellects.com/">Webintellects</a>.

As a web developer I specialize in content management systems.  I have wasted many years of my career on Microsoft technologies, although my personal website was always built using open source tools.  In recent years, when faced with the twin horrors of <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/sharepoint/default.mspx">Sharepoint</a> and <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/cmserver/default.mspx">MS CMS</a>, I just could not go on any more. I just can't imagine an entrepreneur who would willingly use this stuff to build a business.  I quit my job of almost 6 years, took some time off and went on to a job that allows me to use open source tools.  We've had quite a bit of success with <a href="http://drupal.org/">Drupal</a>, a leading open source CMS.

<a href="http://wordpress.org/">Wordpress</a> is a great tool for blogs, but it makes good sense for me to start using Drupal for my own sites, as well as at work. Drupal grows at an astronomical rate, improving in leaps and bounds. I have a couple of modules almost ready for contribution (once I make them a little neater and better documented). Drupal is very scalable, very well designed and has a huge following.  I could not be happier with it as a developer.

In the five years that my website existed in blog format I moved 3 times.  <a href="http://www.livejournal.com/">Livejournal</a> -> <a href="http://www.movabletype.org/">Movable Type</a> -> <a href="http://wordpress.org/">Wordpress</a>. Now it's  <a href="http://drupal.org/">Drupal</a>'s turn.  

I apologize in advance for any annoying symptoms of the move, like refreshing of the RSS feed where already read articles might show up as new, etc. Please bear with me. <a href="http://www.deadprogrammer.com/oy-again-with-the-moving/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using Dreamhost is quickly turning into nightmare. It&#8217;s a cheap, full featured and generous web host, except only good for websites that do not matter (and I think that mine do).  There is no upgrade path to a virtual private server (which is one step below a dedicated machine both in price and performance), their overall uptime is not something I&#8217;d trust, and their blog is just driving me nuts.  At the suggestion of a friend I&#8217;m moving over to <a href="http://www.webintellects.com/">Webintellects</a>.</p>
<p>As a web developer I specialize in content management systems.  I have wasted many years of my career on Microsoft technologies, although my personal website was always built using open source tools.  In recent years, when faced with the twin horrors of <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/sharepoint/default.mspx">Sharepoint</a> and <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/cmserver/default.mspx">MS CMS</a>, I just could not go on any more. I just can&#8217;t imagine an entrepreneur who would willingly use this stuff to build a business.  I quit my job of almost 6 years, took some time off and went on to a job that allows me to use open source tools.  We&#8217;ve had quite a bit of success with <a href="http://drupal.org/">Drupal</a>, a leading open source CMS.</p>
<p><a href="http://wordpress.org/">WordPress</a> is a great tool for blogs, but it makes good sense for me to start using Drupal for my own sites, as well as at work. Drupal grows at an astronomical rate, improving in leaps and bounds. I have a couple of modules almost ready for contribution (once I make them a little neater and better documented). Drupal is very scalable, very well designed and has a huge following.  I could not be happier with it as a developer.</p>
<p>In the five years that my website existed in blog format I moved 3 times.  <a href="http://www.livejournal.com/">Livejournal</a> -> <a href="http://www.movabletype.org/">Movable Type</a> -> <a href="http://wordpress.org/">WordPress</a>. Now it&#8217;s  <a href="http://drupal.org/">Drupal</a>&#8216;s turn.  </p>
<p>I apologize in advance for any annoying symptoms of the move, like refreshing of the RSS feed where already read articles might show up as new, etc. Please bear with me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.deadprogrammer.com/oy-again-with-the-moving/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Silence is Golden</title>
		<link>http://www.deadprogrammer.com/silence-is-golden/#utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=silence-is-golden</link>
		<comments>http://www.deadprogrammer.com/silence-is-golden/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>deadprogrammer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Metablogging]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Somehow, the less I write, the more readers I get. Or seem to get. At least, according to Feedburner.

<img src="http://www.deadprogrammer.com/photos/feedburner-3-06-2007-a.png?9d7bd4">

To be honest with you, I lost some blogging motivation when I could not break the 800 reader barrier for such a long time.  Also, not one reader left me a comment after my <a href="http://www.deadprogrammer.com/index.php?s=%22happy+new+year%22">customary</a> self-made <a href="http://www.deadprogrammer.com/happy-new-year-3">New Year's card</a>. The one lonely comment is from someone to whom I bitterly complained about this terrible injustice and thus does not count. 

Just in case you cared, the seeds that I harvested from the pine cone given to me by a kind Rockefeller Center security guard, spent some time in a fridge and were planted. Well, in fact, I misplaced the packet with most of them somewhere on my desk, but the few that were planted resulted in one baby Rockefeller Center tree.

<img src="http://www.deadprogrammer.com/photos/rockefeller-center-tree-baby.jpg?9d7bd4"> <a href="http://www.deadprogrammer.com/silence-is-golden/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somehow, the less I write, the more readers I get. Or seem to get. At least, according to Feedburner.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.deadprogrammer.com/photos/feedburner-3-06-2007-a.png?9d7bd4"></p>
<p>To be honest with you, I lost some blogging motivation when I could not break the 800 reader barrier for such a long time.  Also, not one reader left me a comment after my <a href="http://www.deadprogrammer.com/index.php?s=%22happy+new+year%22#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed">customary</a> self-made <a href="http://www.deadprogrammer.com/happy-new-year-3#utm_source=feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=feed">New Year&#8217;s card</a>. The one lonely comment is from someone to whom I bitterly complained about this terrible injustice and thus does not count. </p>
<p>Just in case you cared, the seeds that I harvested from the pine cone given to me by a kind Rockefeller Center security guard, spent some time in a fridge and were planted. Well, in fact, I misplaced the packet with most of them somewhere on my desk, but the few that were planted resulted in one baby Rockefeller Center tree.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.deadprogrammer.com/photos/rockefeller-center-tree-baby.jpg?9d7bd4"></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.deadprogrammer.com/silence-is-golden/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>537</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 8/54 queries in 0.025 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 809/889 objects using memcached

Served from: www.deadprogrammer.com @ 2012-05-17 09:46:57 -->
